Thursday, August 20, 2009

Detailed Analysis: House Democrats' Government Takeover of Health Care Destroys Small Business Jobs | Republican Leader John Boehner

Detailed Analysis: House Democrats' Government Takeover of Health Care Destroys Small Business Jobs | Republican Leader John Boehner

With Unemployment Near Double Digits, Section-by-Section Review Reveals Democrats' Government-Run Plan Will Cost Even More Small Business Jobs

Washington, Aug 20 - Middle-class families and small businesses across America are right to ask, “Where are the jobs?” After all, the Administration promised that its trillion-dollar “stimulus” spending bill would provide a “jolt” to the economy and create jobs immediately. However, more than two million jobs have been lost since the “stimulus” became law, and the unemployment rate has risen far beyond the eight percent promised by the Administration if Congress passed the “stimulus.” Now, Washington Democrats are poised to pass legislation that will destroy even more jobs: a costly government takeover of health care that will impose new taxes and Big Government mandates on small businesses and increase their health care costs as well. House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) warns that this will put even more Americans out of work:

“Middle-class families and small businesses want bipartisan solutions that will encourage more job creation at a time when too many Americans are out of work. But Washington Democrats are prepared to go it alone in order to pass a government takeover of health care that will drive up costs, increase our deficits, and destroy countless small business jobs. Republicans have offered better solutions to help small businesses provide quality, affordable health care to their employees and their families. Democrats would be well-served to scrap their costly government-run plan and work with Republicans on bipartisan health care reforms that the American people can support.”



Indeed, a detailed analysis of the Democrats’ government takeover of health care finds that small businesses and their employees don’t fare well under the legislation. Here are just a few examples:

- Page 155-157; Section 321– This section imposes fines of $100 per employee per day on employers who do not offer a level of health coverage that is “government-approved”(employers would pay this fine every day until the oversight is corrected). This means that fines of up to $500,000 can be imposed on employers who make an honest mistake, thinking they had provided what the government deemed “sufficient” coverage.

- Page 189; Section 421 (b)(2) – Under the bill, small businesses could receive subsidies to cover a portion of their health care costs. However, to receive a full subsidy, the average employee income must be below $20,000 and have fewer than 10 employees. This creates a perverse incentive to keep wages low and to not hire new workers.

- Page 150; Section 313 – The bill includes a “small business exclusion” from the eight percent payroll tax, but the definition of small business in the bill leaves a large number of small businesses subject to the full eight percent tax. In fact, on average, small businesses with as few as 12 employees would be subject to a new payroll tax through the bill if they could not afford to provide coverage. Worse, the bill does not index to inflation the amounts which trigger the “small business exemption” meaning that Democrats have built into the bill a mechanism that capture and subject more small employers to the eight percent tax over time.

- Page 198; Section 441 – If the government does not realize savings the authors of the bill claim will occur – even though congressional scorekeepers did not project any savings from these provisions – then the national small business surtax is automatically increased.

- Pages 144-149; Section 312 – The bill mandates that employer contributions cannot come through salary reductions. Under this section, employers have to make a minimum contribution toward the health benefits plan premium for both full-time and less than full-time employees. By the terms of this provision, they cannot take that contribution out of an employee’s salary. That defies logic since any contribution that an employer makes toward a health care premium is necessarily money it cannot pay to its employees in salary. This will lead substantial layoffs as employers face this de facto tax.

Small businesses are the engine of our economy. Instead of punishing them with more taxes and mandates, shouldn’t Washington be encouraging them to create more jobs and provide their employees and their families access to more affordable health care?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spamming will be removed.

Due to spamming. Comments need to be moderated. Your post will appear after moderated regardless of your views as long as they are not abusive in nature. Consistent abusive posters will not be viewed but deleted.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.