'Change must come to Washington,' Mr. Obama said in a June 2008 speech. 'I have consistently said when it comes to solving problems,' he told Jake Tapper of ABC News that same month, 'I don't approach this from a partisan or ideological perspective.'
Mr. Obama also decried the prominent role played by lobbyists. 'Lobbyists aren't just a part of the system in Washington, they're part of the problem,' Mr. Obama said in a May 2008 campaign speech.
I was reminded of this last statement by a recent headline on the front page of USA Today. It read: 'Health care fight swells lobbying. Number of organizations hiring firms doubles in '09.' The article suggested that what Mr. Obama had promised to fix had only gotten worse."
Indeed that's the case. Washington is more partisan than ever, and more polarized. Even on a purely procedural vote to begin Senate debate on health-care reform this past Saturday, every Democrat voted one way (yes), every Republican the other (no).
With rare exception and with no objection from the president, Democrats draft bills with no input from Republicans. In return, Republicans vote in lockstep against Democratic legislation. Every House Republican voted against the stimulus, all but one against liberal health-care reform, and all but eight against cap-and-trade legislation that passed the House earlier this year.
Why has the president's publicly expressed vision of a kinder, gentler Washington failed to materialize? I think Mr. Obama—while hardly the only person at fault—is chiefly responsible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spamming will be removed.
Due to spamming. Comments need to be moderated. Your post will appear after moderated regardless of your views as long as they are not abusive in nature. Consistent abusive posters will not be viewed but deleted.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.