Will Clunkernomics become ClunkerCare? (OneNewsNow.com): "Government healthcare is such an emotionally charged issue that it's become nearly impossible for people to think about rationally, without immediately putting up ideological defenses that thwart any serious conversation regarding its merits. But the recent 'Cash for Clunkers' debacle doesn't have such emotional overtones, and thus allows us a perfect example through which we can view the difference between what the liberal model of central planning and the conservative model of freedom offers the country.
Remember the worthy objectives of this government-run program: (1) benefit the consumer by giving them a financial incentive to purchase a car; (2) benefit the auto industry by stimulating demand for cars; and (3) benefit the environment by replacing gas-guzzlers with fuel-efficient vehicles. No one can or should fault the government planners for their intentions.
But what happened? Certainly some consumers benefited from the rebate they received for purchasing a government-approved car. But what about the consumers that didn't need cars but could have used a new refrigerator, washing machine, or oven? What made their need any less than those looking for new wheels? Why did the government need to show such favoritism, and how is it justified?"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spamming will be removed.
Due to spamming. Comments need to be moderated. Your post will appear after moderated regardless of your views as long as they are not abusive in nature. Consistent abusive posters will not be viewed but deleted.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.